2006 Audi TT vs. 2004 Mazda B2500

To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2500. (204 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2500 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Audi TT 2004 Mazda B2500
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT B2500
Year Released 2006 2004
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3195 cc 4031 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 323 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 100 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.9 mm 85 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1630 kg 1705 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2990 mm