2006 Audi TT vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 866 kg more than 2006 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Armada |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 106 L |