2006 Audi TT vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (280 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | TT | XL7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |