2006 Audi TT vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (178 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 187 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Sable |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |