2006 Audi TT vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 185 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (281 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Audi | Fiat |
Model | TT | Bravo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1368 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 58 L |