2006 Audi TT vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 85 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (282 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | C-Max |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2788 mm |