2006 Audi TT vs. 2010 GMC Savana
To start off, 2010 GMC Savana is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2010 GMC Savana. (195 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Savana weights approximately 685 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 GMC Savana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Savana (352 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (281 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2010 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Savana |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2073 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 117 L |