2006 Audi TT vs. 2010 SSC Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Aero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 812 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 262 kg more than 2010 SSC Aero.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 SSC Aero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1037 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2010 SSC Aero | |
Make | Audi | SSC |
Model | TT | Aero |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3194 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 1062 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1090 mm |