2006 Audi TT vs. 2012 Ford E-150
To start off, 2012 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 225 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1146 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Ford E-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford E-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-150 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (282 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2012 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | E-150 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 132 L |