2006 Audi TT vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (282 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | F-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 132 L |