2006 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 422 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | TT | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |