2006 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 85 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | TT | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |