2006 Bentley Arnage vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Bentley Arnage is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Bentley Arnage (400 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 606 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2006 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Bentley Arnage | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Bentley | Toyota |
Model | Arnage | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6752 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 835 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 1844 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 87 L |