2006 Bentley Azure vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Bentley Azure is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 6,750 cc, 2006 Bentley Azure is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Bentley Azure (875 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 773 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Bentley Azure will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade. 2006 Bentley Azure has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Bentley Azure will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Bentley Azure | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Bentley | MCC |
| Model | Azure | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 598 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 875 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 1810 mm |
