2006 Bentley Azure vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Bentley Azure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Bentley Azure would be higher. At 6,750 cc, 2006 Bentley Azure is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Bentley Azure. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Bentley Azure (875 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XJ. (625 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Bentley Azure will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Bentley Azure | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Bentley | Jaguar |
Model | Azure | XJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 5000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Torque | 875 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3157 mm |