2006 Bentley Continental vs. 2000 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2006 Bentley Continental is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 6,748 cc, 2006 Bentley Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Bentley Continental weights approximately 665 kg more than 2000 Mercury Villager.
Because 2006 Bentley Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Bentley Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Bentley Continental (875 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 604 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Villager. (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Bentley Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Villager.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Bentley Continental | 2000 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Bentley | Mercury |
Model | Continental | Villager |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6748 cc | 3276 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 875 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2860 mm |