2006 BMW 130 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 130. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ. 2006 BMW 130 has automatic transmission and 1953 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1953 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW 130 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 130 | CJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |