2006 BMW 130 vs. 1964 Jaguar Type S
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar Type S. (208 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar Type S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar Type S. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar Type S.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 1964 Jaguar Type S | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 130 | Type S |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 63 L |