2006 BMW 130 vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300. 2006 BMW 130 has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW 130 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 130 | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | 130 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 315 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
