2006 BMW 130 vs. 1989 Buick Skylark
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skylark. (160 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skylark.
Because 2006 BMW 130 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 130. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Buick Skylark. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 1989 Buick Skylark | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 130 | Skylark |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 62 L |