2006 BMW 130 vs. 1995 Kia Capital
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Kia Capital. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Kia Capital would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1995 Kia Capital. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1995 Kia Capital.
Because 2006 BMW 130 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 130. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Kia Capital, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Kia Capital. (153 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Kia Capital.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 1995 Kia Capital | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 130 | Capital |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |