2006 BMW 130 vs. 1997 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 2006 BMW 130 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 130. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 BMW 130 has automatic transmission and 1997 ZAZ Wagon has manual transmission. 1997 ZAZ Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW 130 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 130 | 1997 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | BMW | ZAZ |
| Model | 130 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
