2006 BMW 130 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 BMW 130. (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 130.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 130. (315 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 130.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 130 | XJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |