2006 BMW 130 vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 130. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 130 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 BMW 130. (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 130.
Because 2006 BMW 130 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 130. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac SRX. (302 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 130 | SRX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6950 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 79 L |