2006 BMW 320 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2006 BMW 320 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 320 (149 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 320 weights approximately 411 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 320 (200 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: