2006 BMW 320 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2006 BMW 320. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 320 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2006 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 320 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 320 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2845 mm |