2006 BMW 323 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 323 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 6388 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
