2006 BMW 323 vs. 1964 Trabant Universal
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1964 Trabant Universal. (23 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1964 Trabant Universal.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Trabant Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Trabant Universal. (51 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Trabant Universal.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 1964 Trabant Universal | |
| Make | BMW | Trabant |
| Model | 323 | Universal |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 595 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 23 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 73 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 24 L |
