2006 BMW 323 vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1973 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1973 Datsun 240Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Datsun 240Z. 1973 Datsun 240Z has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW 323 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Datsun 240Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 1973 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | BMW | Datsun |
| Model | 323 | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2393 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
