2006 BMW 323 vs. 1982 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 1982 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 323 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1769 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
