2006 BMW 323 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. (158 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 1995 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 323 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3391 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |