2006 BMW 323 vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (147 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 323 | Bravo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1895 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 21.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 15.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |