2006 BMW 323 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,655 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 323 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4655 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |
