2006 BMW 323 vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | Midge |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1323 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 101 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |