2006 BMW 323 vs. 2000 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2000 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda B2500.
Because 2000 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 2000 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 323 | B2500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2499 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
