2006 BMW 323 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 2002 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 323 | Astro |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4294 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 102 L |