2006 BMW 323 vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 323 | Econovan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1789 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 138 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |