2006 BMW 323 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (186 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1839 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |