2006 BMW 323 vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Because 2004 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | B4000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4031 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 323 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |