2006 BMW 323 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, both 2006 BMW 323 and 2006 Mazda 3 were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (240 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1558 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |