2006 BMW 323 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW 323 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 323 | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 323 | BLS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 265 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 58 L |