2006 BMW 323 vs. 2010 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2010 Ford Kuga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Ford Kuga. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Kuga.
Because 2010 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Kuga (320 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Kuga will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 2010 Ford Kuga | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 323 | Kuga |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1997 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1850 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 53 L |
