2006 BMW 323 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 323 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 323 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1811 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |
