2006 BMW 323 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2006 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 323.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 323. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW 323 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 323 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 323 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3600 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.3 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1882 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
