2006 BMW 325 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2006 BMW 325 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 2,997 cc, 2006 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ6 (300 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 325 | 2002 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 325 | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 2967 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 15.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 85 L |
