2006 BMW 325 vs. 2003 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2006 BMW 325 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Seville (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Seville (407 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 325 | 2003 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 325 | Seville |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 4565 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |