2006 BMW 325 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2006 BMW 325 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 325 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 325 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 5998 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 98 L |
