2006 BMW 325 vs. 2009 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 325 would be higher. At 6,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 325 | 2009 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 325 | Escalade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 6161 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 103.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 16.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 98 L |