2006 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 325 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (569 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 325 | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 325 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 6100 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |
