2006 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 325 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 325 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 3983 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 68 L |